Being and Becoming: Becoming by Being Essay

Pre-Socratic era was marked by periods from Thales of Miletus until that period when Socrates ism was yet to be born. It was during this period when the fundamentals of science (both natural and complaisant were world founded using scientific research and inquiry, and where philosophy and practical science were still married. Sophos tried to show and explain the origin, nature, elements, development and workings of the cosmos by way of argumentative reasoning, critical inquiry and justifications.Pre-Socratic philosophy was in the main characterized by its elements much(prenominal) as essence, remove/absolute, harmony and its effort to understand the essential substance of a thing that showcased its existence and the kinetic safari it undergoes (changes) to be known as what it is today. Among the famous thinkers of this period were Thales, Heraclitus, Anaxagoras, Empedocles, Democritus and Parmenides.Whereas pre-Socratic philosophers have had theorize a common line of arch etype, disparity was inevitable. Among the arguments that showed differences of the philosophy of that period was Parmenides hypothesis of Being and Heraclitus theory of Becoming. Heraclitus argued that the existence of ever soything was brought about by nothing and that it constantly exists through constant change or by undergoing a dynamic transformation. What is more striking about the concept of change for Heraclitus is the concept of change within.According to him, it is that contradiction of elements/substance within the object that caused it to transform and that to cause its change, an external intervening need not to be imposed. Accordingly, for Heraclitus, the world is a continuous struggle and strife, hence it needs change. In contrast, while the intragroup aspect of an existing element undergoes alterations, the process by which an element transforms is ever constant.Through the understanding of the nature of an element, Heraclitus greetd that the fixed states of be ing argon all part of the varied state of perpetual becoming1. In humans, the processes of freehanded birth, living, dying and rebirth are all changes that a person passes through. However, much(prenominal) pattern is a never-ending cycle, after all. What will become of a matter is a product of the dynamic development it subjects itself through a never ceasing rhythm.Contrary to Heraclitus, while Parmenides likewise argued that an object exists because it does exist (that no other factor that may explain the causality of its existence), he failed to recognize if it ever underwent an evolutionary state, thus making it the being as it is today. Because Parmenides believed and patently refuted Heraclitus that the universe was already at the state of stability, why should it be basking on the process of modification? Everything is what it is because it is what it is and it cannot become what it is not.Both arguments are of much recreate specifically in understanding how do we beco me or what impinge on us came to being. Later on during Platos time, both arguments could be reconciled by proposing that, what might become is caused by a being.However, unlike the foregoing arguments of Heraclitus and Parmenides, it is apparent that the reconciliation of the arguments were based on the thought that, indeed, there is a first cause that is never changing plainly rather causes the second being to become what it is today. Note that both the initially mentioned thinkers do not believe on something that might have caused on object to exist.What could be more difficult in the understanding of this parley is the process of analyzing concepts that flourished centuries apart and merging them into one critical explanation such that conflict resolution could be gained.References__________. Philosophy Pages. In Britannica Internet fade Selection. Retrieved April 11, 2008, from http//www.philosophypages.com/dy/p.htmparm__________. (April 16, 2002). Pre-Socratic Era. Posted to http//everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=628825Ballantyne, Paul F., Ph.D. History and Theory of Psychology An proterozoic 21st Century Students Perspective. (2008). Retrieved April 10, 2008, from www.comnet.ca/pballan/section1(210).htmGoodman, Len E. (1992). AvicennaArabic pattern and Culture (pp 53-54). Routledge. Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http//books.google.com.ph/books?id=VJ6x-pcqMicC&pg=PA51&lpg=PA51&dq=resolving+the+argument+of+being+and+becoming&source= weave&ots=gctA47HxTQ&sig=R0YNJ23QzZlvTpaLA5XclFgdKfY&hl=enPPR5,M1Rose, Jake. Being and Becoming. In Ezine Articles. Retrieved April 11, 2008, from http//ezinearticles.com/?Being-and-Becoming&id=148729