Oedipus Essay -- Literary Analysis, Sophocles

Anger is expressed through a variety of reasons. Vague with many divisions and levels, it comprises of divergent types. Anger is a decent emotion that reveals the state of a person. Often, this emotion is uncontrollable because it is used to fee for what has been lost and creates positive and negative effects. Particularly, it is evident when expectations and goals are unfulfilled or do not meet reality. In Sophocless Oedipus the King and Shusaku Endos Silence, the protagonists experience petulance for reasons that differ. Sebastian Rodriguess non-acceptance towards others for their lack of moral values and dignity in concert with Oedipuss hubris and indignation bring a similar result of emotional change. lead by pride, s shows asperity towards those that he feels have the audacity to below the belt mistreat him. When Tiresias refuses to inform him of the murderer, Oedipus answers What, nothing? You miserable old man Youd drive a scar to fury. Do you still refuse? Your gra nitelike heart set in hopeless stubbornness (Sophocles 19). Through his questions, his fury is aroused. Old man (Sophocles 19) is a connotation to degrade Tiresias while the sway (Sophocles 19) is personified to erupt from anger due to his loathsomeness. Likewise, his heart is personified to be recreant for calculating together with a supposed assassin. After Tiresias divulges that Oedipus is guilty, Oedipus alleges, So this is what he wants, Creon the loyal, Creon so long my chum Stealing up to overthrow and snatch (Sophocles 22). accusing Creon through his sarcastic tone, positive adjectives such as loyal (Sophocles 22) and coadjutor (Sophocles 22) otherwise heightens a sense of betrayal. As he is unjustly surmised, chided and criminate as self-cen... ...d the possibilities are hindered by pride, and the most unexpected and impossible female genitalia occur. Frequently, people are oblivious to their own flaws by unknowingly belongings the same malfeasance and chiding othe rs. By judging others, they become the very verbalism and evil that they hate. Oedipuss anger, while incognizant about the entire plight, seems much(prenominal) justifiable than that of Rodrigues who continues criticizing people after having seen the entire perspective of the situation. He focuses on the narrower view rather than evaluating it as a whole. Both characters exhibit several(predicate) sides of anger and pose the question, what extent anger is justifiable? Perhaps the marrow that the authors intended to convey was that human beings are biased based on their limited point of view, and therefore fallible. This is an ongoing and innate flaw that we mustiness learn from. Oedipus Essay -- Literary Analysis, SophoclesAnger is expressed through a variety of reasons. Vague with many divisions and levels, it comprises of different types. Anger is a powerful emotion that reveals the state of a person. Often, this emotion is uncontrollable because it is used to touch on for what has been lost and creates positive and negative effects. Particularly, it is evident when expectations and goals are unfulfilled or do not meet reality. In Sophocless Oedipus the King and Shusaku Endos Silence, the protagonists experience anger for reasons that differ. Sebastian Rodriguess non-acceptance towards others for their lack of moral values and dignity together with Oedipuss hubris and indignation bring a similar result of emotional change. guide by pride, s shows asperity towards those that he feels have the audacity to unfairly mistreat him. When Tiresias refuses to inform him of the murderer, Oedipus answers What, nothing? You miserable old man Youd drive a stone to fury. Do you still refuse? Your flinty heart set in hopeless stubbornness (Sophocles 19). Through his questions, his anger is aroused. Old man (Sophocles 19) is a connotation to degrade Tiresias while the stone (Sophocles 19) is personified to erupt from anger due to his loathsomeness . Likewise, his heart is personified to be recreant for designing together with a supposed assassin. After Tiresias divulges that Oedipus is guilty, Oedipus alleges, So this is what he wants, Creon the loyal, Creon so long my friend Stealing up to overthrow and snatch (Sophocles 22). criminate Creon through his sarcastic tone, positive adjectives such as loyal (Sophocles 22) and friend (Sophocles 22) otherwise heightens a sense of betrayal. As he is unjustly surmised, chided and accuse as self-cen... ...d the possibilities are hindered by pride, and the most unexpected and impossible piece of ass occur. Frequently, people are oblivious to their own flaws by unknowingly guardianship the same malfeasance and chiding others. By judging others, they become the very font and evil that they hate. Oedipuss anger, while incognizant about the entire plight, seems more justifiable than that of Rodrigues who continues criticizing people after having seen the entire perspective of the sit uation. He focuses on the narrower view rather than evaluating it as a whole. Both characters exhibit different sides of anger and pose the question, what extent anger is justifiable? Perhaps the subject matter that the authors intended to convey was that human beings are biased based on their limited point of view, and therefore fallible. This is an ongoing and innate flaw that we must learn from.