The Deepwater Horizon Accident Management Essay

The Deep body of water panorama Accident Management Essay1. IntroductionThe concept of telling loss loss leadershiphip represents a theoretical framework to contemplate the case register Deepwater Horizon Accident. The idea of an effective leader can be captured by the following basic principlesThe leader must have a considerable term and strategic heap (what should be achieved? How should be achieved? Who should achieve an place goal?).A leader should be focused on people. This implies the appellative of instrumental goals, their effective communication, and human universes involvement. The involvement depends both on inducing system and involvement. Effective leaders are increasingly characterised as being enablers fostering people and organisations to perform and develop. This implies that the leader has to achieve a innovative alignment surrounded by peoples needs and the aims of the organisationThe leader needs to balance, consort and integrate opposite ethnica l set (Hofstede). The conflicting values and cultural differences emerge whenever a leader deals with stakeholders (consumers, environmental groups, trade unions). Hofestede (1978) identifies four dimensions to analyse cultural value of nations. He expounds the following elementspower distance several(prenominal)ism vs. collectivismMasculinity vs. femininityWeak vs. strong uncertainty avoidanceLong vs. in brief term orientation2. The Case StudyThe Deepwater Horizon Accident was caused by the escape of hydrocarbons resulting in explosions and fire on the fudge. At that time the social media emphasis in this accident is not wholly close the death of eleven people and the injury of seven, but to a fault in connection with main environmental damages ( such as the rig sank and the continued flow of hydrocarbons from the reservoir).The following investigating reveals thatThe team did not identify any single action or inaction that caused this accident. Rather, a composite and in terlinked series of mechanical failures, human judgments, engineering design, operational implementation and team interfaces came together to allow the initiation and escalation of the accident. Multiple companies, work teams and circumstances were knotted over time.( BP 2010, 5)Thus, the problematic situation in Mexican Gulf seems to be generated by the leadership style, as the leader failed to focus on developing a clear vision and communication and exercising strong underwrite to the organization. This statement represents a thought provoking situation in disposition to analyse the behaviour and leadership style of three leaders (Tony Hayward, sorrel Dudley, and Barack Obama)2.1 Tony HaywardAt the time of natural disaster Tony Hayward was the Chief decision maker of BP. In gluiness with Hofstede (1978), he showed a short term vision in his communication activity. The Guardian (14 May 2010) indicate that the Chief executive stated The Gulf of Mexico is a very big ocean. The amount of volume of embrocate colour and dispersant we are putting into it is tiny in relation to the total water volume. The same article report the emerging conflicts between BPs efforts (to retrovert the spill had succeeded in dispersing the oil and preventing large amounts reaching the shoreline around the Gulf) and the environmentalists concerns the unobserved damage being done to marine life. Additionally, Tony Hayward admitted that BP had made mistakes in its primordial response to the crisis. It initially refused to compensate fishermen who were unable to produce written validation of their normal earnings. Instead, his main worry concerned share values and dinero distribution. The leader also failed to deal with the stakeholders revealing an individualistic approach and short term vision in firms management style. This eyeshot was also revealed by the weak safety policy adopted by the BP Company.2.2 dockage Dudley hobby the criticism related to Tony Hayward, Bob Du dley was designated as the impertinent Bp Chief Executive. Mr Dudley linked the board of BP before, as his most high-profile role was as the chief executive of BPs joint venture in Russia, exploiting oil fields in eastern Siberia.The BBC report (2010) reveals Mr Dudley is widely respected within the company, and from a PR point of view, it might help that he is the Statesn, not British. BP has often been draw as Public Enemy Number One in the US since the oil spill. Now that the company is to be run by an American, it could help it in its battle to rebuild its reputation in the US. In coherence with Hofestede (1978), this assumption underlines the implications of national distance on leadership recognition and recruitment.The Christian Science Monitor (2010) also reports BPs voice in America will no longer come with a British speech pattern attached. The Christian Science Monitor (2010) also indicatesThe oil industry is demanding one, so bob Dudley is use to dealing with proble m around the world. He is not to solve the problem immediacy but he is plant life to plug the wellhead leak. At the same he has been very painstaking to the how he speaks to the person.In accordance with these empirical evidences a crisis management requires happening theory can explain leadership style. (Mintzberg, 1979).However, an some other criticism from Bob Dudleys leadership style related to high ethical and moral issues. This aspect emerges with his previous experiences in Russia area..2.3 Barack ObamaThe new leader of US, Barack Obama has signalled the intention to assign nefarious charges in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster. Mr Obama said that the US giving medication feels BP must pay for clean-up of the spill.This approach can be equated the position of Obama to that of a leader of social justice.However, there some critical aspectsA. the social media describe that Obama was playing play game during the oil crisesB. the majority of Americans disapproves of how Mr Obama has managed the crisisC. the republicans accuses Mr Obama of exploiting the crisis for his own political gain., pledging to make for those responsible to justice if laws were broken. President Barack Obama sharpened his criticism of BP Plc and fighted the pushing giant to halt the oil gushing from its ruptured well.President Barack Obama has been criticised for playing golf while the BP oil spill disaster continues Barack Obama has been criticised for continuing to play golf while oil spills into the Gulf of Mexico. He has played at least(prenominal) seven times since the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded on April 20, creating Americas biggest environmental disaster. Having already racked up 39 games since taking office, Mr Obama is approaching the record as the U.S. President spending the most time on the golf course. Republican Party chairman Michael Steele has called on the President to stop playing until the oil leak has been curbed.The satisfaction of employees and c ommunication was effective .indeed his inspiration been put in place and focus in company. it argue that the organization context operates has for the most part of failed. Critics would argue that is due to the behaviour characteristic. The leader had such difficulty in focus on systems maintenances, and meets the work criteria in which cause numbers of harmful disaster and left eleven people without live. Unwillingness in leaders is composed of negative associate with productivity subordinate.The factors analysis produced two distinctly behaviour dimensions and differences in these behaviours associate to effectiveness. One series of studies has collect see however according to theory enhance a subordinate scholarship of a link between the effort and outcomes.The leadership styles did not providing opportunities for reference work special managers and staff in this system management the relationship between leader and mangers wasnt based on trust, seemed forgotten to inspire their subordinates to do affair behind the capabilities, the key issue of these was in communication and implement the vision affect.ConclusionTony is not great global diplomat was more an individual in the organization his concern was more in share values and obviously on profit, unfortunately his turn the company into disaster. But about that Bob Dudley is a better choice better communication with press comes cross with good knowledge. accord to query analysis the new leader has more energy and understanding leader, with full of expectation.Compare with new leader political Obama uncertain when comes to decision and culture problems when comes to share in other hands Mr Obama has spend most his time in the Mexican gulf, research saying that he has approach the record in US .The investigation theres not such evidence requires the court order. Unsuccessful the Leader had not exercise strong control of the organization. This is due of the characteristic and style of the leader.no t surprisingly, a large amount of research showing that the result was catastrophic. point that relationship between leader behaviour and his effectiveness was modified by the organization. It can been seen leader has specific difficulties such maintaining work standardsBob Dudley fill-in its certain he will move the company forwards, beside is not unlike in the gulf or BP or the US press.he works in oil field for such long time place, such as Russia and demonstrated well work under the pressure with ability and focused and he work standards in Russian was well known. Mr Dudley was undefiled by the major operation problems such as Alaska and Deepwater Horizon has a good vision and strategy.The company move forward with a new leader and new regulations but its unknown that Dudley will change the culture, According to research theres no doubt however, he focus on suppuration a clear vision to the future company by communicating effectively and exercises strong control of the organ ization.It was a very interesting spirit level to research